Patriot act pros and cons

Saturday, May 28th, 2011 - News

Patriot act pros and cons – This monster was originally shortly after the attacks to 11 September 2001. The unification and strengthening America by providing appropriate tools to intercept and obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 generally the “Patriot Act”is named.

Patriot act pros and cons Patriot act pros and consThis act of Congress expressly amended 11 existing laws of Congress (Electronic Communications Privacy Act, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, Money Laundering Control Act, Bank Secrecy Act, the right act for financial account; Fair Credit Reporting Act, Immigration and Nationality Act, Victims of Crime Act of 1984, Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act) and by default part of the Bill of Rights.

The Patriot Act has been rightly criticized for his “approval of indefinite detentions of immigrants, the law enforcement authorities search by looking for a home or business without the consent of the owner or the resident permission or knowledge, the expanded use of National Security Letters, which allowed the FBI phone, e-mail and financial records without a court order finding and expanding the access of law enforcement authorities business records, including library and financial records.

If the USA PATRIOT Act is a serious threat to the Bill of Rights and the freedoms of U.S. citizens? Or is it simply a well-regulated set of tools that allow federal agents to track down terrorists in a fast paced world of cyber-communication? These were the positions of opposing sides at a forum last Thursday at the Traverse Area District Library carved on “How the USA PATRIOT Act impact you?” . The 347-page Act was rushed into law at the insistence of the U.S. Department of Justice, only 45 days after the 9 / 11 catastrophe and an overwhelming majority of legislators who have little or no chance of reading his convoluted language and obscure references approved. Since then she has perceived as a serious threat of civil rights and librarians around the country.